Preserve fixed positions
Family-specific 40S, 60S, and P-site annotations define bases that cannot change during proposal.
Internal ribosome entry site (IRES) · one-dimensional, two-dimensional, and three-dimensional evidence
Scientific Design Engine · Regulatory ribonucleic acid (RNA) design
TrioIRES designs family-specific intergenic-region internal ribosome entry site RNA under fixed recognition constraints. A candidate moves through activity-model, topology, and selective three-dimensional geometry evidence before receiving a final ranking.

The publication-ready PyMOL gallery shows the resolved IRES chains extracted from ribosome-complex structures for CrPV, IAPV, and TSV.
Evidence boundary. The panels are experimental reference coordinates; they do not show generated candidates or activity.01 / Abstract and project definition
TrioIRES is a computational design system for Class IV intergenic-region internal ribosome entry site (IGR IRES) ribonucleic acid (RNA). It turns a family-specific reference package into constrained sequence proposals, explicit gate decisions, component evidence, and a stable candidate ranking.
The reference package contains sequence length, fixed recognition positions, a literature-consensus two-dimensional partner map, a resolved Protein Data Bank (PDB) chain, and optional recognition groups for the 40S small ribosomal subunit, 60S large ribosomal subunit, and P-site region. The current reference set covers cricket paralysis virus (CrPV), Taura syndrome virus (TSV), and Israeli acute paralysis virus (IAPV). Generated-candidate experimental activity remains a downstream validation endpoint.
02 / Scientific problem
The mutable positions form a large constrained search space. A high activity-model score can still accompany broken fixed sites, incompatible topology, or implausible geometry. TrioIRES applies inexpensive sequence and topology gates before selective three-dimensional evaluation, and it keeps the evidence behind each decision separate.
Family-specific 40S, 60S, and P-site annotations define bases that cannot change during proposal.
Candidate partner maps are compared with literature-consensus targets and thermodynamic ensemble evidence.
Predicted single-chain coordinates are compared with available reference residues while unresolved coverage remains visible.
03 / Method overview
A constrained tree inserts fixed bases directly and exposes nucleotide choices only at mutable positions. Batched rollout completes candidate sequences. A ten-model encoder ensemble supplies one-dimensional activity evidence; KnotFold and ViennaRNA supply two-dimensional topology and thermodynamic evidence; and one eligible candidate per rollout batch advances to RhoFold+ or OpenFold3 single-chain geometry review.
A ten-model encoder ensemble returns mean activity probability while length and guanine–cytosine content remain hard constraints.
Output · One-dimensional activity evidenceKnotFold partner maps are compared with conserved and mutable target regions alongside ViennaRNA ensemble defect.
Output · Two-dimensional topology evidencePredicted single-chain coordinates are compared with resolved reference positions, chain connections, local motifs, and recognition groups.
Output · Three-dimensional geometry evidenceA stable final score supports candidate comparison while a transformed search signal serves branch selection and backpropagation.
Output · Ranking plus search guidance04 / Architecture
Inputs, operations, evidence, and outputs stay named so the source of each decision can be reviewed.
Sequence length, fixed sites, allowed mutable bases, consensus topology, resolved chain, and recognition annotations.
→Fixed bases are inserted directly; mutable positions expose only allowed nucleotide choices.
→Mean activity probability plus length and composition constraints.
→Pseudoknot-aware partner agreement, conserved-region fit, and thermodynamic evidence.
→RhoFold+ or OpenFold3 single-chain prediction compared with the resolved reference chain.
→Sequence, gate state, component readouts, final ranking, search guidance, and provenance.
05 / End-to-end workflow
Each stage consumes a bounded object and leaves a reviewable artifact for the next stage.
Assemble one family-specific target with sequence length, fixed sites, two-dimensional topology, resolved chain, and recognition groups.
Create a constrained tree state that inserts fixed bases and exposes allowed nucleotide choices at mutable positions.
Generate explicit constrained blocks and reject invalid length or fixed-position changes before scoring.
Complete batched suffix candidates to increase the chance that at least one survives inexpensive screens.
Apply activity and topology screens, then advance one eligible candidate per batch to geometry evaluation.
Return component values, gate states, a stable ten-point final ranking, and separate search guidance.
06 / Experimental design
Every study below describes what was varied, what was measured, and where interpretation must stop.
The Class 1 target has complete resolved-chain coverage. Its ViennaRNA partner set is contained within the pseudoknot-aware KnotFold map, which contributes additional pairs.
The Class 2 target exposes model choice: only 18 reference-sequence pairs are shared by the KnotFold and ViennaRNA maps.
The Class 2 target has partial coordinate coverage. Fifty positions lack resolved reference coordinates, so geometry interpretation remains coverage-aware.
07 / Results and evidence
Quantitative summaries, structural views, and scientific interpretation remain separate layers.
CrPV, TSV, and IAPV define the current search targets
Ensemble mean supplies the one-dimensional prior
Selective three-dimensional review follows cheaper gates
Wet-lab activity remains pending
CrPV, TSV, and IAPV provide literature-consensus secondary structures, fixed recognition annotations, and resolved chains that define target-specific design constraints. The resolved-coordinate coverage is 100%, 98.5%, and 80.2% respectively.
Boundary. Reference availability supports target definition and computational comparison; it does not establish activity for generated sequences.For CrPV, the 42 ViennaRNA pairs are shared with the 61-pair KnotFold map. TSV shares only 18 pairs between its 47-pair KnotFold and 59-pair ViennaRNA maps. IAPV shares 42 pairs while KnotFold contributes 15 additional pairs.
Boundary. Partner-map agreement is structural-model evidence and does not measure translation activity.The implemented stack can produce activity, topology, and selective geometry evidence, yet the current public package contains reference structures and method evidence. Generated-candidate structure exports and wet-lab activity results remain open.
Boundary. No candidate success state is assigned without the corresponding public evidence.
The arc map exposes 61 consensus pairs across 190 nucleotides and marks the 68 fixed recognition positions used by constrained search.
Evidence boundary. A target topology map defines structural intent and does not report generated-candidate function.
The IAPV reference combines a 253-nucleotide target, 57 consensus pairs, 84 fixed positions, and 203 resolved residues.
Evidence boundary. Unresolved positions limit any geometry comparison and remain explicit in interpretation.Reading key
08 / Limitations and provenance
The new page excludes the former coordinate-line projections and uses professional molecular rendering for three-dimensional structure evidence.
The public package does not contain generated-candidate activity distributions, assay protocols, controls, or completed wet-lab results.
RhoFold+ and OpenFold3 candidate structures omit the complete ribosome-bound environment and remain model comparisons.
IAPV lacks coordinates for 50 target positions, and the auxiliary Plautia stali intestine virus (PSIV) reference has only 32 of 196 residues resolved.
KnotFold and ViennaRNA partner maps differ substantially for TSV, so model choice remains part of the evidence rather than a hidden assumption.